"“We have lent a huge amount of money to the U.S. Of course we are concerned about the safety of our assets. To be honest, I am definitely a little worried.” "


Chinese premier Wen Jiabao 12th March 2009


""We have a financial system that is run by private shareholders, managed by private institutions, and we'd like to do our best to preserve that system."


Timothy Geithner US Secretary of the Treasury, previously President of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.1/3/2009

Showing posts with label data security?. Show all posts
Showing posts with label data security?. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 31, 2007

Fly to the US and pass their Terrism Test courtesy HMQ

BBC Online report that MEPs want to know whether that passenger data surrendered to the US authorities is fed into the US Automated Targeting System (ATS), which profiles possible terrism suspects.

The US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) released information about the targeting system in December, explaining that it was intended to detect high-risk individuals not previously known to the law-enforcement community.

The BBC say that the EC has already written to the US government to ask whether the ATS profiling system is using air passenger records in ways that fall outside the current EU-US agreement ... which for the UK is pointless because ......

Here is relevant part of the Order which inserts a new article 141A into the Air Navigation Order 2005.... which The Queen's Most Excellent Majesty in Council At the Court at Buckingham Palace, the 19th day of July 2005 with the advice of Her Privy Council had ordered.
2006 No. 2316 / CIVIL AVIATION
The Air Navigation (Amendment) Order 2006 Made - - - - 5th September 2006 /Laid before Parliament 7th September 2006 / Coming into force - - 30th September 2006
At the Court at Balmoral, the 5th day of September 2006
Present, The Queen’s Most Excellent Majesty in Council
Her Majesty, in exercise of the powers conferred upon Her by sections 60(1), (2)(b), (3)(h) and (4), 61(1)(a) and 102(2)(b) of, and paragraph 2 of Part 3 of Schedule 13 to, the Civil Aviation Act 1982(a), is pleased, by and with the advice of Her Privy Council, to order as follows:

Citation and commencement
1. This Order may be cited as the Air Navigation (Amendment) Order 2006 and shall come into force on 30th September 2006.

141A.—(1) The Secretary of State may give a direction to any person who is an operator of an aircraft referred to in paragraph (2) requiring him to take the action referred to in
paragraph (3)......

(3) The action referred to in paragraph (1) is the making available electronically of data in
respect of all passengers and crew on the aircraft or expected to be on the aircraft.

WHAT IS AN ORDER IN COUNCIL ?

An Order-in-Council is effectively a species of statutory instrument (which are regulated by the Statutory Instruments Act 1946 in the UK), albeit subject to more formalities than a simple statutory instrument. They are simply law making by decree. Like all statutory instruments, they may either be annulled in pursuance of a resolution of either the House of Commons or the House of Lords ('negative resolution procedure') or require to be approved by a resolution of either House, or, exceptionally, both ('affirmative resolution procedure').

With devolution these powers have been preserved , the Scotland Act 1998 provides that draft Orders-in-Council may be laid before the Scottish Parliament in certain circumstances in the same way as they would have been laid before the Westminster Parliament . In Wales from 2007 legislation put before the Welsh Assembly will be enacted through Orders-in-Council after following the affirmative resolution procedure. In this case the obligation to provide the data is outside any arrangements the EC may have or will make. There is no time limit on this Order - which of course "in theory could be raised in the Houses of Parliament".

That's how your democratic freedoms are protected. God Bless you Your Majesty !

Wednesday, November 01, 2006

Google 2nd Generation Wiki on the way - Jotspot gobbled up


Based in Palo Alto CA, JotSpot, is a private company started in 2004 by Excite.com co-founders Joe Kraus and Graham Spencer, the company had launched the first of 2G wiki applications allowing anyone to create, publish, and share collaborative and personalized wiki applications. Google Inc. bought them today for an undisclosed sum.

JotSpot's wiki allows you to create rich web-based spreadsheets, calendars, documents and photo galleries. Easy as a word processor — no need to know HTML / XML . JotSpot has 30,000 paid users and some 2,000 businesses are using JotSpot to manage projects, build an intranet, share files and stay in sync with colleagues and customers inluding Oxford University Press and E-Bay.

The 27 employees will move 6 miles down the road to Google's Mountain View headquarters.

Shares of Google rose $1.96 to $478.53 on NASDAQ

Founder Joe Kraus Upon graduated from Stanford University in 1993, he joined with five engineering friends to found the highly successful Internet company, Excite, Inc. After leaving Excite@Home in 2000, Joe was a co-founder of Digitalconsumer.org, a non-profit grassroots consumer organization with more than 50,000 members dedicated to protecting consumers fair-use rights to digital media. Joe, along with other JotSpot cofounder GrahamSpencer, continues to work on these important issues. In addition to his non-profit focus, he has also spent many years as an angel investor, working with numerous early-stage technology companies. Here is a downloadable 32 minute Podtech interview with Joe Kraus by Robert Scoble.

Read Joe's thoughts on start ups in June this year - Joe is a smart guy - read it carefully

Briefly ..

Excite.com took $3,000,000 to get from idea to launch. JotSpot took $100,000.

Why on earth is there a 30X difference? There’s probably a lot of reasons, but here are my top four. I’m interested in hearing about what other people think are factors as well.

Hardware is 100X cheaper

Infrastructure software is free

Access to Global Labor Markets

Search Engine Marketing (SEM) changes everything

He also writes ... "
We spent a crap-load of money. There’s an old adage in television advertising (actually apocryphal remark of Lord Leverhulme about selling Sunlight Soap about 1900) “I know half my money is wasted. Trouble is, I don’t know what half”. That was us.

They could have spent a few shillings on some decent typography when they designed the logo.

If you want the smutty, dirty lowdown on how online porn funds Wikipedia read Lord Patel here "100 things you didn't know about Wikipedia".

(C) Very Seriously Disorganised Criminals 2002/3/4/5/6/7/8/9 - copy anything you wish