Vaccination of schoolgirls for HPV using Cervarix ® should be stopped. NOW
The fevered and prurient interest by educators in the sex lives of school girls takes a curious turn when they return to school next month.
With little or no discussion it has been decided to commence mass vaccination of all 12 and 13-year-old girls at all schools in the UK. This will start with the first of 3 doses of a vaccine that will reduce the chances of harbouring a sexually transmitted human papilloma virus which is now known to be proven agent of causing cervical cancer.
70% (ish) of all HPV viruses so transmitted can cause cervical cancers - a lethal (if undiscovered by regular smear examinations) and terrifying illness. This claims about 100 lives in Scotland every year - the average age at death being about 60.
In Scotland the Catholic Church originally raised objections to the vaccination programme - "jab" in tabloid speak) because it may encourage promiscuity. Church elders in SCotland have now performed a screeching U turn after twistin gthe arms of reaching an agreement with health and education staff.
Now girls, when vaccinated will receive no accompanying advice on the need to use condoms to protect themselves from other sexually transmitted diseases. More than half of the 5,000 female chlamydia patients in Scotland last year were under the age of 20.
The programme is due to start next month and schools are set to send out consent forms for the scheme from the beginning of September.
One wonders if the girls (and possibly even their parents) will be advised that another vacccine ,Gardasil (but sold by an American drug company) also provides protection from genital warts - it is marginally more expensive than the British Cervarix® product marketed by GSK.
One also wonders if the Roman Catholic elders have approved further advice for girls and their parents that HPV is transmissable during oral sex (however configured) , between women, by the use of sex toys and anal sex.
This wholesale experiment using a new vaccine (see Friday, March 14, 2008 GSK's claim cervarix HPV vaccine affords long-term protection against fourmain HPV types ) which has not tested (unlike Gardasil see Tuesday, July 08, 2008 Gardasil® gets 7,802 adverse reports to CDC by VAERS system ) on large populations is being forced onto girls (boys who contract the viruses and pass it on are not to be vaccinated) and their parents with litle informed discussion. Monday, July 21, 2008 NHS decide on vaccine from UK based GSK - Cervarix® for teenage girls for cervical cancer causing HPV virus - genital warts ignored - none for boys
Cervical smear testing will continue. Because of medical ethics, if testing discovers the presence of Sexually Transmitted Infections (STI's) this information will not be recorded, or passed on by the laboratory to the doctor or the patient.
This experiment (it is nothing else) is costly, unnecessary, it is for an illness that affects a diminishing number of women - due to the success of the decades of pap smear testing. Like any vaccination programme it will have side effects, some of them devastating and even fatal.
This insane programme should be stopped. NOW.
Lord Patel has been following this pharmaceutical bononaza for some time - Friday, June 09, 2006 Merck's Gardasil cleared - now you can inject your 9 year old girl against an STD For previous posts about HPV vaccines go here.
If you have children (or grandchildren) who will be affected by this policy you should consult your GP immediately.
UPDATE Sunday 7th September 2008 - Apparently pupils will NOT need parental signed consent. They are deemed old enough to make informed consent alone.
2 comments:
This experiment (it is nothing else) is costly, unnecessary, it is for an illness that affects a diminishing number of women - due to the success of the decades of pap smear testing. Like any vaccination programme it will have ise efefcts, some of them devastating and even fatal.
This is just like the fluoride thing isn't it?
At first sight, the possibility that people are being deliberately pumped full of toxic crap to suit some ulterior objective just seems to unfeasible to seriously entertain
but then, on a little further research...
oh dear
A material safety data sheet from Eli Lilly and Co., which no longer makes a flu vaccine, says effects of exposure to thimerosal may include "fetal changes, decreased offspring survival and lung tissue changes. ... Exposure in utero and in children may cause mild to severe mental retardation and
mild to severe motor coordination impairment."
In 2003 in the US the Homeland Security Act had some "earmarks" added as it was rushed through, which are explained in the usually excellent Congress Library Reports "Homeland Security Act of 2002: Tort Liability Provisions"
http://assets.opencrs.com/rpts/RL31649_20050923.pdf
Tort liability is traditionally governed by state law, but Congress has the power to regulate it when it affects interstate commerce. Past instances in which Congress has limited tort liability include the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, which is discussed below, and the September 11th Victim Compensation Fund of 2001.1 The Homeland Security Act of 2002, P.L. 107-296, contains the following provisions that limit tort liability, and this report examines each of them.
Sections 1714 -1717 of the Homeland Security Act 2003 limit the tort liability of manufacturers and
administrators of the components and ingredients of various vaccines; these sections reportedly were designed to benefit pharmaceutical manufacturer Eli Lilly in suits against it concerning Thimerosal. *****These section were repealed by P.L. 108-7 (2003).******
Although sections 1714-1717 apply to the components and ingredients of every vaccine listed in the Vaccine Injury Table, press reports indicate that this provision was intended to benefit pharmaceutical manufacturer Eli Lilly, which has been “a major target in a spate of lawsuits filed since 2000” concerning Thimerosal, which is a preservative used in some childhood vaccines. Thimerosal contains mercury, which allegedly has caused autism in some vaccinated children.
Mitch Daniels who had been WH Budget Director under Ronald Reagan and had been a senior executive at Eli LIlly and also been on the staff of Rep Senator Lugar of Indiana where Eli Lilly was headquartered was said to have helped lobby for this curious earmark.
Naturally the concerns over thimerasol involved spectactularly complicated lawsuits ..
Courts, however, have held that Thimerosal is not an “adulterant” or “contaminant” as used in the statute (as quoted above), but is a vaccine “component” and therefore was covered by the Program before enactment of the Homeland Security Act of 2002. A case decided in September 2002 stated:
It appears that every federal court to have ruled on the issue has held that injuries resulting from Thimerosal contained in vaccines are vaccine-related under the 31007709 (W.D.Tex. August 23, 2002) (holding the injuries were vaccine related in a motion to dismiss); Owens v. Am. Home Prods. Corp. 203 F. Supp.2d 748 (S.D. Tex. 2002); see also McDonald v. Abbott Labs, 02-77 (S.D. Miss. Aug. 1, 2002); Collins v. Am. Home Prods. Corp., 01-979 (S.D.Miss. Aug. 1, 2002); Stewart v. Am. Home Prods. Corp., 02-427 (S.D. Miss. Aug. 1, 2002)(denying motion to remand and granting motion to dismiss); Strauss v. American Home Prod. Corp., 208 F. Supp.2d 711 (S.D. Tex., 2002) (finding injuries fromThimerosal are “vaccine-related” under the Vaccine Act); Blackmon v. American
Home Prod. Corp., Cause No. G-02-179 (S.D. Tex. May 8, 2002) (same); Owens v. American Home Prod. Corp., 203 F. Supp.2d 748 (S.D. Tex. 2002)(same).
Additionally, the Department of Health and Human Services has taken the position that Thimerosal is not an adulterant or contaminant of vaccines. It appears, therefore, that, with respect to Thimerosal, sections 1714-1717 would have made a difference only to the extent that they would have precluded future court decisions that disagree with these.
The US centre for Disease Control has useful advice on thimerasol influenza vaccines here
http://www.cdc.gov/FLU/ABOUT/QA/thimerosal.htm
To the question :Does the influenza vaccine contain thimerosal?
The answer is Yes, the majority of influenza vaccines distributed in the United States currently contain thimerosal as a preservative. However, some contain only trace amounts of thimerosal and are considered by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to be preservative-free. Manufacturers of preservative-free flu vaccine use thimerosal early in the manufacturing process. The thimerosal gets diluted as the vaccine goes through the steps in processing. By the end of the manufacturing process there is not enough thimerosal left in the vaccine to act as a preservative and the vaccine is labeled "preservative-free".
Investigations by the UK Committee on Safety of Medicine, Europe's Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products and the World Health Organization have concluded the preservative thimerasol was safe.
Your State Broadcasting Corporation on line Monday, 25 April, 2005,
"Blood 'fast' to expel jab mercury "
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/4472485.stm
Thimerosal is being phased out of use in vaccines in the UK.
The new five-in-one vaccine to immunise babies against polio, diphtheria, tetanus, whooping cough and hib introduced last autumn replaced a jab which contained mercury.
Only hepatitis B and influenza in the UK programme now contain thimerosal.
Your State Broadcasting Corporation on line 5 July 2006
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/5149670.stm
Jabs link to autism 'dispelled'
So that's alright then. No problems then or now with thimerasol so we are phasing it out....precautionary principle ...OK ... now go back to sleep baby.
Post a Comment