IPCC eco feak, deluded fool Chris Field misuses AAAS meeting in Chicago to purvey nonsense and lies - aided by Press / Tv and our own lovely BBC
IPCC scientist Chris Field of Stanford University and the Carnegie Institution for Science warns that global warming in the 21st century is likely to accelerate at a much faster pace and cause more environmental damage than predicted. In a contribution to the much publicised American Association for the Advancement of Science in Chicago during a symposium titled, "What Is New and Surprising Since the IPCC Fourth Assessment?"
"There is a real risk that human-caused climate change will accelerate the release of carbon dioxide from forest and tundra ecosystems, which have been storing a lot of carbon for thousands of years," said Field,.blah, blah, blah Times 14th Feb. BBC Online 15th Feb plus endlessly rolling Radio/ TV / World News items.
This brought to mind the comment on some thread somewhere by a wry observer that these guys are like the guys who piss on the beach and when the tide comes in admire the results of their handiwork.
Such news reports never mention the eralier refutation of the IPCC Nbel Prize winning reports refutations this year ..eg
We, an independent group of experts in various aspects of science and the environment, ask you to redress the lack of scientific integrity of the UN’s Climate Change Panel (IPCC) and to stop them making reactionary and futile ‘Climate Change’ recommendations that hold back the developing world.
As you read this, policies that you endorse are already causing misery and starvation for the world's poor.
On the 14th of April this year some of us wrote to the Chair of the IPCC, Dr Rajendra Pachauri, copied below and available on the UN CAPSA site (ref E), asking him to present clear and graphic evidence of the theory that carbon dioxide (CO2) drives global temperature. We pointed out that no such evidence exists and offered charts and references that refute the man-made global warming theory.
Read more here with links of letter by scientists to IPCC Chair Dr Rajendra Pachauri.
What are we measuring for Co2 content ?
It is exasprating whenfigures are published for Co2 content of the atmosphere expressed as parts per million. The atmosphere, stratosphere , troposhpere how high are we going ? How homgenous is it ? Not very judging by the way Pinaturbo volcanoe debris hung around Asia for decades
Here is a classic example of measures of earth - the area - you are lucky if many of these fugures are within 3% accuracy.
510 Mm2 Total surface area of Earth 510 Mm2 - Water 360Mm2 Land 150Mm2
US 9,629,091 (Km2) 6.5% of total Earth Land area.
UK 242,900 (Km2) 0.16% of total Earth Land area.
= Total of England (130,422 km²), Scotland (78,133 km²), Wales (20,779 km²), and Northern Ireland (13,576 km²).
Alaska the largest US State is 1,717,854 sq km - ie you could fit in 7 UK's.
Zimbabwe is 386, 669 sq km 3 times the size of England.
So we here in this septic isle feel that we affect in any demonstrable way the global atmosphere ?
Of course our world changes , always had, and the sun affects our surface temperature, always has, always will.
Doesn't mean we should keep on pumping out shit, exhausts etc., Here at Forthcoming UK Energy Deficit (UKED) founded in 1999 we are all for energy consevation, fuel consevation reduction of exhaust gases, particulates, nitrous oxides ..
CO2 Sceptics Blog also see very useful current Discussion "BBC Global Warming underestimated BBC" here